On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 02:10, Mike Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think anyone is saying that tracks can't have additional uses, > just that one of those uses has to be forestry, agriculture (and maybe > mineral extraction/energy). > They HAVE to have one of those uses? Really? No exceptions. Back in my pre-OSM days, I rather naively assumed a track was a way that was not a public route and which had ruts left by the vehicles that used it. As in the vehicles left tracks in the ground. Obviously, I'm far more confused now and have no idea what anything means any more. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
