On 8/6/20 10:14 pm, Paul Allen wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 10:33, Cornelis <corneli...@web.de
<mailto:corneli...@web.de>> wrote:
With these tags and the surrounding footways the bridge is treatey
as normal (foot)way by OSRM and graphhopper, altough it only falls
dry roughly every other autumn. Is this a tagging issue that may
be resolved with correct/additional tags? After reading the
discussion I think at least three tags should be added:
Then some questions on other tags currently in use:
• historic=bridge seems ok to me, but I'm not sure if it is a
conflict with building=bridge. Do I have to choose either one?
They are not mutually exclusive. If it is a tourist attraction then
it could
also have tourism=attraction.
• intermittent seems to only be in use with water bodies, as far
as i can tell after reading the wiki article.
• seasonal is somewhat related with intermittent but in use for
other things as well. Should I remove these two, nonetheless?
Neither seem appropriate to me. However, what you should have is
access=no
to prevent routers from including it in walking routes. What you could
do, to
show it is occasionally usable (if it is), is something like:
access=no
access:conditional=yes @ (above water)
I would keep seasonal but make it more specific
seasonal=autumn
Conditional key does not look to have text base entry ... might be
better to use opening hours?
opening_hours= "above water" ???
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
