>Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 11:31:20 +0200 >From: Cornelis <corneli...@web.de> >To: tagging@openstreetmap.org >Subject: Re: [Tagging] Features underwater (inside reservoirs) >Message-ID: <d27da201-539a-a35a-bde5-bce0be7b8...@web.de> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>This thread is a great help to me, as I recently discovered this bridge >and wondered if it can be tagged in a more appropriate way: >https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.18387/8.95239 >Currently it is tagged like that (shortened): >historic=bridge >intermittent=yes >layer=-1 >man_made=bridge >name=Aseler Brücke >seasonal=yes >tourism=attraction >With these tags and the surrounding footways the bridge is treated as >normal (foot)way by OSRM and graphhopper, although it only falls dry >roughly every other autumn. Is this a tagging issue that may be resolved >with correct/additional tags? After reading the discussion I think at >least three tags should be added: >building=bridge >abandoned=yes >location=underwater >Then some questions on other tags currently in use: >• historic=bridge seems ok to me, but I'm not sure if it is a conflict >with building=bridge. Do I have to choose either one? >• intermittent seems to only be in use with water bodies, as far as i >can tell after reading the wiki article. >• seasonal is somewhat related with intermittent but in use for other >things as well. Should I remove these two, nonetheless? >Regards >Cornelis Have you considered "flood_prone=yes" (14700 uses in taginfo), although I guess that is more used for places that are normally dry and only occasionally wet?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
