This was originally sent to the Talk mailing list, but it is better if it
is discussed on the Tagging mailing list:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

I agree that razed, completely demolished railways, where all traces of the
former track-bed have been removed, should be removed from OpenStreetMap.

It is still considered acceptable to map abandoned railways, where the old
railway grade remains, even though the metal rails have been removed.

However, note that there are some people who are very committed to mapping
historical and abandoned railways, so there may be resistance to removing
these features.

See the long discussions about rendering railway=abandoned at
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/542 and
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/586 for example.

Also see the previous discussion at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Railways#Abandoned_railways_where_all_evidence_has_been_removed

– Joseph Eisenberg

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 9:40 PM Jack Armstrong <jacknst...@sprynet.com>
wrote:

> Greetings.
>
>
> Recently, a user mapped “razed” railways inside a construction zone (link
> below). These rails had been removed by our local mappers since they don’t
> exist anymore. Using the latest imagery (Maxar), you can see the rails have
> been completely removed from “Project 70”, a $1.2 billion Denver-area
> transportation corridor construction project.
>
>
> I think this mapper has good intentions, but what is the point of mapping
> something that does not exist? Doesn’t this clearly contradict the OSM Good
> Practice wiki in regards the sections, “Verifiability”, “Map what's on the
> ground” and “Don't map historic events and historic features”? The last
> section states, "*Do not map objects if they do not exist currently*."
>
>
> Should we tag (invisible) razed sidewalks? Should we leave (invisible)
> destroyed buildings in place, tag them as razed and then create new
> buildings on top of them?
>
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/39.78016/-104.94562
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> t...@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to