On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 09:05, Phake Nick <c933...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2020-05-08 Fri 20:45, Jarek Piórkowski <ja...@piorkowski.ca> wrote: >> How much discussion do you think should be necessary before voting "I >> oppose, because I think using sub-tags is better"? If someone thinks >> that, they think that. A discussion would just print the arguments >> back and forth. > > Given the proportion of opposing comment being raised, I would say "more than > what have been discussed", as barely anyone raised the point during the > discussion. The only two remotely relevant mentions about it during the > discussion process was 1. one user who think there should be a new parents > tag that cover both regular taxi and motorcycle taxi, and 2. another who > incorrectly assuned "motorcycle taxi" is a combination of two different > features just because the term come with a space. That clearly indicate > discussion was not sufficient and that the proposal should restart the > discussion process.
I'm assuming you mean the following messages in the February thread? 1. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-February/051244.html 2. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-February/051250.html Do you expect others who agree with already-stated positions to write in with a copy? More widely, it is my impression that "refining with sub-tags vs creating new tags" has been a culture conflict in OSM since long before I became active. (I'm just waiting for the fireworks when someone suggests public_transport=platform + motorcycle=yes) These objections are not new. You might not agree with them, but their existence should not surprise you. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ --Jarek _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
