As I already wrote before in this thread, lutz already agreed with and
supported my proposal.
My problem with the actual ref tag is that there are many ref tags for
other schemes and elements, but I don't know if this concern is
pointless or not.
I would like to see this scheme more organized and not so ambiguous data
wise, but I don't know if that's technically better or if there are
actual problems with ref tag being "all over the place".


Às 19:56 de 20/04/2020, Paul Allen escreveu:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 16:47, António Madeira <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    So, I would like to know what would be the technical pros and cons
    regarding heritage:ref:operator=* vs ref:operator=* , i.e. the
    database use, rendering, consulting, exporting etc.


AFAIK, only one map makes use of heritage*.  So if you can persuade
lutz that
your scheme is a good one, it will be dealt with accordingly.

--
Paul


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to