Yes, but it need at least an attempt to reach to a few big contributors of this tag to discuss it. As often with specialized tags, this list may lacks some experts. Actually I found one reference of mtb=* as an access tag here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle_tags_map So maybe it isn't worth it. Yves
Le 5 avril 2020 11:52:26 GMT+02:00, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> a écrit : >I agree with Martin here, if tags are used but not documented on the >wiki, >discussion on the mailing lists or through a proposal process, how >would >such tags hold any meaning? Different editors probably add it to mean >different things. We can't really make any assumptions about what they >mean, which is why this whole discussion exists so we can have some >kind of >contract between people entering tags and people consuming data, so we >have >a shared understanding of the meaning of those tags. > >Anyone who's used the mtb= tags so far, it would be great to hear what >this >was meant to mean. > >On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 19:08, Martin Koppenhoefer ><dieterdre...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> >> >> Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 11:03 Uhr schrieb Yves <yve...@mailbox.org>: >> >>> As a side note: I would be worried to redefine the mtb=yes/no tag >that is >>> not documented but widely used. >>> >> >> >> how can it be "redefined" if there isn't documentation about it? >> >> Cheers >> Martin >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
