But highway=path is for unspecified, mixed use or generic paths. A > designated mountain bike track is not that, it's a path specifically for > bicycles. > > If mountain bike tracks should be tagged as highway=path, then the > definition of path needs to be changed to not be an unspecified or mixed > use path. > No. If the MTB path is not open to pedestrians, you add foot=no, and possibly horse=no, in addition to your mtb:scale tags
Sure, you could say if you have a cycleway with smoothness=horrible and tracktype=grade5 and foot=no and horse=no you have the same thing, but ther, Please keep paths that can only be used by MTB clearly different from >> cycleways that can be used non-MTB bicycles. >> > > I always assumed that's what the mtb:*=* tags were for, but smoothness= is > also suitable here since it even lists specific types of bicycles which > would be suitable http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness > Yes, the mtb: tags would in theory be able to convert als a cycleway in an MTB track - see above, but it is much simpler to keep the meaning that a cycleway is a cycleway and implies that you can use it with a normal bicycle.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
