On 15/3/20 6:25 pm, Tomas Straupis wrote:
2020-03-15, sk, 08:53 Warin rašė:
There is no real 'force' on a mapper to do anything. If a mapper chooses not to
use the subtags then they don't have to.
landuse=meadow was mention together with natural=grassland etc. If
it is only about subtags meadow=* - I'm fine with that.
Ok. So meadow must have grass etc. But it also must be used for grazing or
producing 'hay'.
And that is the part that is missing from some uses.
By placing the use first I hope to reduce the misuse and place some emphases on
the land use aspect rather than the fast reader just seeing the grass reference.
Similar can be said of many sub tags. If mappers want to map it then give them
a way to do so in a logical manner.
Sure. That is why I commented. Amalgamating landuse for map
rendering is not a trivial task.
Off topic, but indeed.
There are large areas of central Australia used for grazing that do not fit
this 'meadow' description - nor should they,
Possibly landuse=grazing with natural=scrub or some other land cover tag could
be used there.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
