I think including the actual route is useful and makes life easier for downstream users (they don't need a routing engine to show the route), could this be optional so you can create a public transport route relation via waypoints only if you prefer as a starting point, but then still allow it to be completed via the way members.
A bit like how most things can be initially mapped as a node but then are usually expanded out into an area. Secondly I don't quite understand the no way member rule of your proposal, since railways platforms should be a way https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=platform then including the platform in the relation means you need to include ways as relation members. On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 21:08, John Doe <music.kash...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Stereo and I have been working on a schema that makes it easier to create > and maintain public transport route relations. We would like to invite > feedback, questions, and suggestions, so it can mature and hopefully gain > widespread use. > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Simpler_public_transport_route_relations > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
