Yes, both wikis are (were)poorly exemplified, especially when comparing
between them.
As a 900 years catholic country, Portugal has thousands of crosses
everywhere and it would be nice to clearly differentiate them.
The man_made=cross wiki is now much more explicit and not so restrict
with that summit cross thing.
Thanks, Mateusz!
Às 09:12 de 05/03/2020, Martin Koppenhoefer escreveu:
sent from a phone
On 5. Mar 2020, at 02:06, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
So if the crosses which you want to map are "always religious and most
of the time historic", probably this tag is more appropriate for most
of them, certainly for all 3 examples which you linked above.
I would see it similarly, for sure the first example. The independence cross,
second example, typologically would not fall into the “wayside” class IMHO. It
is kind of those monumental crosses raised at elevated positions, more similar
to a summit cross.
The cross on the square (3rd example) also isn’t the typical “wayside” type,
but could be an edge case which is still in. These interpretations are based on
the assumption that wayside cross actually means wayside cross, and not any
kind of cross.
I would tag any wayside cross with the historic=wayside_cross tags, not just
those that are “historic” (what ever this means, it isn’t clear in any way).
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
