On 2/25/20 4:05 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 03:36, Jonathon Rossi <j...@jonorossi.com> wrote: > >> Does OSM have a position on these tracking parameters, >> WT.mc_id, utm_*, fbclid, etc? > > I'd be in favour of their automated removal, and adding filters to > prevent their future addition. +1. I don't see why it's anyone else's business that I'm coming to their site from OSM data.
> We should not, of course, remove either the full URLs nor the whole > PoIs, since that would open us up to attack from bad actors > masquerading as the companies whose commercial sites we depict. And > would in any case be a ridiculous over-reaction, and damaging to our > reputation. I don't think anyone is suggesting to remove whole URLs or POIs; it's all about removing the tracking rubbish and only the tracking rubbish. -- Shawn K. Quinn <skqu...@rushpost.com> http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
