Hi,
I did some thing similar, too.
highway:lanes=cycleway|footway
surface:lanes=
width:lanes=
in addition to all the normal (fallback) tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27131742
Didn't use bicycle:lanes=designated|no or foot:lanes=no|designated though.
But I like it. I'm going to also do that in the future.
Yours
Am 04.02.2020 um 10:40 schrieb Volker Schmidt:
Thanks, Marc, for spotting the spelling error.
you seem to have a typo in the "foot:lanes=no|dsgnated"
But when I look at the Mapillary photo's I think there are 2 bicycle
lanes (one for each direction) and a sidewalk (there is a kerb) for
pedestrians.
Yes, there is a (mini-) kerb) and hence I could tag this as as two
separate ways.
Let's move to a nearby foot-cycle-way: Mapillary foto
<https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/FAvNjhxkGmRdSaoJZOwzdA>
I mapped it as a separate foot-cycle-path
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87548993> with segregation, because
it is separated from the main carriageway by metal arcs. So let me
repeat my question for this one:
how can I tag the relative position of the foot lane and the cycling
lane on this segregated foot-cycle-path?
Would
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
segregated=yes
bicycle:lanes=designated|no
foot:lanes=no|designated
width:lanes=2.5|1.5
width=4
a correct tagging?
Volker
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
