On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 02:12, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 15:49, St Niklaas <st.nikl...@live.nl> wrote: > >> >> >> IMHO it is never a well taken decision to tag a path / bridleway for >> walking or pedestrians at the same time. Ill shut up when walking a path >> and Equestrians have been using the same trail or path, a horseshoe tends >> to spoil the surface ruinous. Only a rocky hillside trail could stand it. >> >> I would not consider a bridleway as anything else despite Andy’s opinion. >> > > bridleways may be used by pedestrians and cyclists as well > as by equestrians. Some bridleways may not be suitable for all > pedestrians, > but legally they are permitted to at least try to use them. >
In our Hinterland, which is heavily forested, at least some of the fire trails (usually quite, to very!, rough vehicle tracks intended for use by Rural Fire Service / National Parks to be able get in to fight bush fires in inaccessible areas) are signposted as equestrian & cycle paths, but make absolutely no mention of walkers, either allowing or forbidding? Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
