Le sam. 18 janv. 2020 à 18:37, European Water Project <europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com> a écrit : > drinking_water:fee=yes/no > drinking_water:fee:conditional="no @ customers" alternavite: > drinking_water:fee:customers=no > I can see how this works from a logic point of view, but still seems a bit > convoluted > > I still prefer this because in one tag, we get almost everything. I do > realize there is some inconsistency with this tag name. > drinking_water:free=<no/yes/customers>
Ok, I understand, if we look at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/fee#values other values exist like unknown, donation or even time table. There also some tags meaning "free for customers" but different syntax, it's little messy, so maybe we should normalize that with drinking_water:fee=free_for_customers ? (There is also drinking_water:fee=customers but I don't understand what it can means, only customers have to pay ? that's weird.) The problem I have with drinking_water:free is that free is not a tag currently, and it would be an alias for drinking_water:fee with opposite value. > I even think that drinking_water:free = yes might be a sufficient tag for all > cafes, bars, clubs and restaurants willing to participate in the refill > revolution. And that the bottle precision might only be necessary for those > refusing bottles and insisting on serving a glass of water. I agree. -- Florimond Berthoux _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
