I would prefer oneway:foot=yes or foot:oneway=yes - the meaning of
this tag is obvios.

"foot:backward=no" is not very intuitive.

- Joseph Eisenberg

On 1/13/20, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am So., 12. Jan. 2020 um 19:05 Uhr schrieb Dave F via Tagging <
> tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
>
>> The OP clearly defines the scope of his question with "pedestrian
>> highways"
>
>
>
> that's not clear at all, apparently it should not contain
> highway=pedestrian but only (path, footway and track). Surely I would not
> call a track a pedestrian highway. Anyway, on this list of highway types,
> oneway=yes would clearly lead to major problems if the meaning would be
> changed to apply to pedestrians.
>
> IMHO the best solution on the table is
> foot:backward=no
>
> Can you explain where you see issues with this?
>
> Cheers
> Martin
>

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to