I would prefer oneway:foot=yes or foot:oneway=yes - the meaning of this tag is obvios.
"foot:backward=no" is not very intuitive. - Joseph Eisenberg On 1/13/20, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am So., 12. Jan. 2020 um 19:05 Uhr schrieb Dave F via Tagging < > tagging@openstreetmap.org>: > >> The OP clearly defines the scope of his question with "pedestrian >> highways" > > > > that's not clear at all, apparently it should not contain > highway=pedestrian but only (path, footway and track). Surely I would not > call a track a pedestrian highway. Anyway, on this list of highway types, > oneway=yes would clearly lead to major problems if the meaning would be > changed to apply to pedestrians. > > IMHO the best solution on the table is > foot:backward=no > > Can you explain where you see issues with this? > > Cheers > Martin > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging