13 Jan 2020, 10:42 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:

>
> How about free_water=yes if it is available to anybody, and 
> free_water=customers if it is only available to paying customers?
>
>
+1 

And free_water=no for explicit tagging of not providing a free water.

> I assume this could actually apply to all manner of objects, including pubs, 
> bus stations, town squares... If so, there is no need to reference 
> amenity=cafe etc in the tagging standards, other than as a non-normative 
> illustration or example.
>
Though I am unsure whatever tagging town square with mapped
amenity=drinking_water is a good idea.


> Referencing carafe is not a good plan; firstly that is the container, not the 
> contents and this proposal is about the contents. Secondly, many other things 
> are frequently served in carafes, such as wine. So free_carafe=yes may end up 
> disappointing a few people...
>
And water is not always served in a carafe. 

And as bonus this tag is significantly less clear in meaning (even "carafe" word
is among rare ones, more likely to be unknown).
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to