Hi Joseph, Le sam. 11 janv. 2020 à 06:21, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Who is using route=power? > Some electricity mappers including me. route=power represents a circuit (metallic continuity) between two or more substations. It is different from a line as a physical lines can hold several of those circuits for a given distance (situations where you have n x 3 cables in a 3-phases power network). > It has no documentation except for a rather confusing Proposal page > ( > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_routing_proposal/Tagging_similar_to_Transportation_routes > ) > but it's used 15,000 times. > The proposal didn't reach the requested consensus. There are currently two options for power routing, including route=power but until now we didn't manage to find a single solution to be voted. Discussion is still open I think. > Is this feature actually useful and verifiable? > It is really useful and verifiable : follow the connected cables. Some countries like France make open data available that describe those relations. See this Overpass query to see how it's going for RTE in France : https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yUw We've just finished a few days ago to complete all ~1520 relations for 400kV and 225kV. Le sam. 11 janv. 2020 à 07:03, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Is this feature actually useful and verifiable? > > Not usefull. > > Wow, how can you say that? > However I view them similar to roads .. there maybe a power line there .. but > 'traffic' can be in both directions. > > I see no point in having a dedicated 'route' for power. > > Let us know how you can map this without a route relation : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6194774 Given the fact this line holds two independent circuits : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130110647 All the best François
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
