Warin <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven > I think; > Those who bicycle know why there needs to be these classes. > Those who don't ride a bicycle regularly see no need for these classes.
I wonder which of these groups you think I am in... Hint: Nederland. > For those that see no need for these classes .. what harm will they do to the > data base? > > I am ignoring the 'verification' argument for the time being. > > P.S. I personally see no need to specify how a power line is attached to a > pole .. others are quite happy to map such detail. So I have no objection to > there mapping, I will never use it nor map it. > > > On 10/1/20 7:36 am, Peter Elderson wrote: >> I don't see why it's not a type=route route=bicycle. Bicycle routes do not >> have to be exclusive or any particular type of road, just signposted as a >> bicycle route. You can tag extra attributes of course. >> >> Best, Peter Elderson _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
