Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

[Warin]

On 07/12/19 14:09, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 at 13:07, Martin Koppenhoefer 
<dieterdre...@gmail.com <mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On 7. Dec 2019, at 01:51, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com
    <mailto:pelder...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    I think a simple oneway=yes on a hiking route relation could say
    it's signposted for one direction.


    I would prefer being more explicit in the tag name, e.g.
    sign_direction=forward/backward/both

    pedestrian_oneway=yes
    or maybe

    oneway:foot=yes


Where it's a restriction on the walking path, then oneway=yes on the 
way, when it's a restriction on the route a oneway=yes on the route is 
the way to go.

If oneway=yes is placed on a route relation then any excursions and 
appropriate approaches will have to be separate relations. Meaning there 
will have to be a super relation to combine them...


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging