Alessandro: good work! Andy T.: site relations are used for onshore wind farms as the 'farm' is the collection of turbines and not the areas in-between which are still used for farming, etc. It _might_ apply to a solar farm where fields of panels are not contiguous, but generally we have used a site boundary polygon for a security fence.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:58 PM Alessandro Sarretta < alessandro.sarre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank to everybody, the text has been changed (by Mateusz Konieczny) > accordingly: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space&diff=1928515&oldid=1890083 > > Ale > > On 03/12/19 23:42, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > > > >> On 3. Dec 2019, at 20:32, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I doubt it is useful to use a type=site relation with parking_space > features at all. But your proposed rewording would be an improvement. > > > > I mostly agree, although one could construct situations where you might > want to relate e.g. parking ticket machines or surveillance cameras > (located outside the parking and represented by nodes) to specific > parkings. Generally it doesn’t seem helpful to require a site relation, in > most cases it wouldn’t add anything. > > > > Cheers Martin > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
