On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 02:55, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:

OK, I'm looking at it in these images now:
>
>
> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=wnh2yPXi1HakCH5-dILZHw&lat=51.81508205831051&lng=8.849023785442114&z=17
>
> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=QPacIZqNSt0x4CasddMBKg&lat=51.81481744674556&lng=8.849143013905326&z=17
>
> From the ground, this is pretty unambiguously a mini roundabout to my
> eyes, albeit a somewhat large one.
>

Ah.  Looking at it via iD caused me to misinterpret small images.  You're
right, the
central island is clear of obstructions and physically traversable.  Is it
legally so?
Does that white line painted around it have legal significance?


> The important part is that the median is not physical.
>

Necessary, but not sufficient.  It doesn't just have to be physically
treaversable, it has
to be legally traversable.

-- 
Paul
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to