I'd go with landuse=forestry on the property, a tag that was suggested here a while back. This isn't official or anything, but moving towards tagging forest parcels differently from the trees seems important.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, 3:32 PM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> wrote: > > > > 9 Oct 2019, 18:11 by pene...@live.fr: > > Hello, there. > > My question is simple: how do we tag such things? The > boundary=forest_compartment relation is not rendered, and what is rendered > is tagging as landuse=forest both the forest and its parcels, which leads > to rendering it twice, as you can see here: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6086515 Besides, such forest are > often mistagged for the renderer: as the contributor wants the parcel > number rendered, he puts it in the name tag, not in the ref tag, to which I > assume it should belong. > > So, is there an "official"/recommended/widespread way to tag forest > parcels, their number and them belonging to a forest? > > boundary=forest_compartment? > > Is there anything wrong with this tagging > scheme (except that mapping this > kind of info seems a bit dubious to me). > > All problems that you mention are > about tagging for renderer. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
