I moved the content of my proposal to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Discussions/tagging/contact:phone_or_phone because I don't work with categories and therefore I did not realize the problem of two proposal in one page. As you can see I did not stayed into the "Proposed_features" Schema because I do not propose a feature. I propose the deprecation of a feature. This is a difference!
The content there tends to document the de-facto described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone but shorter and in my opinion a bit more clear and faster to read except the last points I simply copied from the source wiki page. I hope I documented the de- faction well enough for you. If not, feel free to chance and improve it but do not mark your changes as minor edit. I want to keep track on the changes made to the page I created so I can use these changes to handle the upcoming discussion here. As a reminder: The pre-discussion took place in thread https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-September/048339.html and the outcome was to deprecate "contact:phone" MY OWN OPINION: I personally think that "contact:phone" is schematically better but I also agree that "phone" is better because it's a shorter key, better to find in the wiki and used widely among the community. So I propose deprecating "contact:phone" for the reason why I think "phone" will win (or has already won according to its sightly more usage). Cheerio Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram On Sat, 2019-09-28 at 10:31 +0200, Valor Naram wrote: > Hey, > > now I'm ready to open a new proposal which you can see here > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Phone#Second_proposal_.28pending.29 > > I use the old proposal page for that but seperated content into > section > to keep the history intact. The content is based on the discussion at > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-September/048339.html > > . It tends to deprecate `contact:phone` in favor of the more used de- > facto `phone` tag. It's awful that we have two tags for the same > puropose in our database and that makes it more difficult for > developers and researchers to work with our data. > > Cheers > > Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
