Am Di., 1. Okt. 2019 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com>:
> > > Whether we have a relation `type=group name=Munros` or whether we have >> a tag: `hillbagging:munro=yes` (and yes, I agree that if we go the >> latter route, a namespace is a good idea) is something to which I'm >> largely indifferent. I'm weakly inclined to the latter (despite what I >> said in an earlier post) only because of the technological problems of >> maintaining a relation that spans a broad geographic area. > > > Ah, I'd forgotten about the problem with editors. Unless I've missed > something, > it's incredibly difficult to add geographically-dispersed members of a > relation > using iD. So namespacing gets my vote. > I'm also in favor of tags, because with relations you would have to find the relation to add a new member, which is not very practical for dispersed objects in any editor. More specific keys (call it namespacing) are better for context and conflict prevention, +1 Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
