On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 08:10, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 27. Sep 2019, at 13:52, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Another counter-argument: we don't have any tag indicating residential > usage other > > than building=house > > we do, there are terrace, duplex, villa, apartments, caravan, detached and > probably more. They are implying residential purpose just the same as does > „house“. > And they are all building=*. We can have building=industrial + amenity=place_of_worship + religion=christian for a church in a unit on an industrial estate. We don't have that orthogonality for residential uses. Yes, there's building:use (which didn't go through an approval process) but it's not orthogonal to tags like amenity=*. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
