On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 14:48, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
E.g. an abandoned:building is probably more a ruin than a building, while a > disused building is still a building. > Either way, the building is still visible and can be used for navigation purposes. If you add disused=yes or abandoned=yes the building still renders. Use a lifecycle prefix and it doesn't render. Some consider that an argument not to use lifecycle prefixes on physical objects that are still present, but only use it on non-physical tags. For example, there is a former pub near me. It is a listed building and still has a prominent, old-fashioned sign which is part of the reason it is listed (so the sign cannot legally be removed). It is now used as a domestic residence, but the misleading sign remains. It's not a disused building. It's also not a pub, but it is easily mistaken for one. disused:building=* would be very wrong. Some would argue against disused:amenity=pub (historical information) but in this case I think it's justified (even though I expect somebody to chime in and say it's not). https://goo.gl/maps/u6yjAaRwH6A4JjZh6 BTW, that's on national cycle route 82, so whether or not it really is a pub would be of interest to some mappers. Mapping it as amenity=pub + disused=yes would (if carto is consistent with other times I've tried disused=yes) render it as a pub where disused:amenity=pub does not render it as a pub. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
