A link would be better to reach the document https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Utility_markers_proposal
Sorry for noise François Le jeu. 19 sept. 2019 à 23:59, François Lacombe <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi all, > > Following useful comments received about the utility markers proposal, it > has been reworked a bit. > > Now marker=* is used to classify markers upon their shape and design, > which allows to include already used marker=stone in it. marker=* is > intended in the specific context of utility markers but can be used > elsewhere if suitable. > This change enable to get rid of support=* key as the design of the marker > implies the support. It's now more convenient to use marker=* on another > feature (marker=plate on power=pole for instance). > > utility=* key is introduced to give information of what is actually > referred by the marker. > More valuable than the colour (which is nevertheless optional), utility > will be usable in many contexts and situations with a set of commonly > adopted values and ability to define more local ones if required. > > For now I'm still in favour of deprecating pipeline=marker and don't > encourage to use power=marker any more (I'm aware this require a > significant effort > As explained, markers aren't part of pipelines or cables and they should > get their own key as to not clutter several keys with the same concept. > > > Feel free to raise concerns on Talk page, all the best > > François >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
