On 18/09/19 09:02, Paul Allen wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 23:46, brad <bradha...@fastmail.com <mailto:bradha...@fastmail.com>> wrote:
    I think it's valid tag for a campsite,


I think it can be, on larger camp sites, which have several washing machines in a
dedicated building.

     It's not much different than any other self service coin operated
    laundry.


Yes and no.  Many camp sites charge, and do so with a coin-op mechanism.  The problem is tagging the access.  Those machines are generally available for use only by people staying on the site (they could accept anyone, but usually do not).  How are you going to tag that?  We don't have access=campers and access=customers doesn't really make sense because anybody using a coin-op machine is a customer.  It's possible
we need access=residents,
The campers are customers of the camp-site .. tag the camp-site as 
access customers and then only campers can get to the laundry.
Residents? To me that means people living there, long term. Campers are 
usually tourists, short term.. so not residents.
which would have possible usages in other situations
such as camping site shops (some are open to non-residents) and things like gyms or washing machines in apartment blocks.  But trying to use access=* for anything not related to transport gets a lot of (probably justified) dissent.
It gets used for clubs, swimming pools, sporting facilities...
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to