On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 at 08:17, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for the not: namespace. > +1 It may be applicable to other tags on objects which are prone to misidentification and which are not better handled by lifestyle prefixes. Where an object is no longer used as an X (or used for anything else now) then disused is appropriate. Where it never was used as an X, but there is a risk of it being identified as such, then not is appropriate. Some will complain that we should only tag verifiable things, but the not: prefix is important to ensure accuracy by reducing mistakes. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
