"and so there is a wikidata item about them both, and it has a property "has part" which has values of Constantia and Felix objects. Constantia and Felix have a property "part of"."
Doesn't this mean that it would be better to create separate Wikidata items for each separate OSM feature, rather than creating a new OSM tag? On 9/11/19, Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> wrote: > sri, 11. ruj 2019. u 13:04 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > napisao je: > >> One problem is that wikidata does not allow to have the same wikipedia >> article for several wikidata objects. >> > > Yes it does. Look at this object: > > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q23837517 > > Its about one saint, Constantia, who was always mentioned together with > Felix, her saint brother. She has no wikipedia articles about her, only > about them both: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_and_Constantia > > and so there is a wikidata item about them both, and it has a property "has > part" which has values of Constantia and Felix objects. Constantia and > Felix have a property "part of". > > So in some cases we can divide the wikidata object if it helps with > identifying the OSM object. But again, I'm not sure this is the case with > Malta, because the article is about the state, and the city is "inside" the > state. When you reference the state, you imply the city inside it. Felix > and Constantia are totally separate entities, and you don't imply one when > you reference the other. > > Janko > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
