Have not stayed at a campsite that charges for showers for sometime now but many require a token, rather than coins.
Phil (trigpoint) On Tuesday, 10 September 2019, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > >shower:fee=yes > > I believe "yes/no" is better for fee, since the value may change frequently. > > If you are mapping detailed information about the showers, it would > be best to map these as a separate node with amenity=shower, if you > know it's correct location. > > In that case you could use hot_water=yes and fee=yes etc. instead of > having to use namespacing. See > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dshower > > The proposal only approves shower=yes/no and amenity=shower but that > doesn't stop you from using shower=hot and shower:fee=* if you want > to. > > > capacity:powered / power_supply=30 ? > > While you could do that, if you are getting into that much detail it > might be better to map each tourism=camp_pitch, if you have time for > it. Then you can tag each camp_pitch with power_supply individually. > > - Joseph > > On 9/10/19, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 at 11:22, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> Another question :-) > >> > > > > & again! > > > > There are powered pitches available, but there are only 30 of them (mixture > > of tent & caravan), while there are virtually unlimited numbers of > > unpowered pitches. > > > > capacity:powered / power_supply=30 ? > > > > Thanks > > > > Graeme > > > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Sent from my Sailfish device _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
