Hi again, How about landuse=mixed_rural? Would that be useful to areas you know about?
Best regards Diego El mar., 3 sept. 2019 a las 16:48, Diego Cruz (<ginkar...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Hi everybody, > > Thank you for your replies! > > I'm not so happy about the idea of having three different landuse tags > that in most cases will be rendered incorrectly. Besides, how can you know > what is the main use and what is the secondary one? The thing is that this > is a mixed system, and in Spain and Portugal it covers tens of thousands of > hectares. > > I don't know the existence of this type of mixed usage of land in other > parts of the world, but I don't mind dropping the Spanish name in favour of > a universal concept, such as landuse=agrosylvopastoral (which would be the > most accurate so far). However, it is true that it wouldn't be intuitive to > non-native English speakers in other parts of the world where a mixed > system is in use, and consequently they may choose to use a local name > instead. How would agrosylvopastoral sound to native English speakers? > > Does anybody know about other areas in the world where there is an > extensive mixed use of territory? > > Best regards > Diego > > El dom., 1 sept. 2019 a las 0:44, Paul Allen (<pla16...@gmail.com>) > escribió: > >> On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 at 22:46, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> I would not renounce from having dehesa somewhere in the value, if this >>> is an „English“ term and exactly what you want to tag. >>> >> >> It's not a term this Englishman has heard of. But there are a lot of >> specialist terms I've >> learned since I started mapping. So I did some googling. It doesn't >> appear to be a >> term in English. It seems to be something found in southern and central >> Spain, >> and also southern Portugal (where it's called a montado). See >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dehesa >> >> The Wikipedia article suggests a possibility for a landuse tag: >> landuse=agrosylvopastoral. >> A bit of a mouthful, but perhaps gets around the objection to calling it >> agroforestry. An >> alternative found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvopasture would be >> landuse=sylvopasture. >> Disadvantage of either of those is they may not be intuitively obvious. >> Advantage is we >> don't have to come up with subtags to define it. >> >> -- >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
