True, that's something that could be added to the tagging scheme. For example "route=foot|hiking" explaining the difference in de explanation column.
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:07:56 -0400, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm all for harmonizing, as well - but let's bear in mind that in some > places, a 'walking' route and a 'hiking' route may be distinct > concepts, partly in terms of accessibility. If a walking route can be > managed by Grandpa with his cane and two-year-old granddaughter in > tow, that's hardly what an American would call 'hiking'! > > But we surely don't need four inconsistent classifications! > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:08 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 13/08/19 19:12, Peter Elderson wrote: > > > > I am all for harmonizing the wiki pages about walking routes. > > > > +1 > > > > When that is done, I would like to do the Dutch translation and discuss the > > tagging scheme. > > > > Vr gr Peter Elderson > > > > > > Op di 13 aug. 2019 om 10:52 schreef s8evq <s8...@runbox.com>: > >> > >> Hello everyone, > >> > >> On the discussion page of the wiki entry Hiking > >> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Hiking#Synchronize_wiki_page_Hiking.2C_Walking_Routes.2C_route.3Dhiking_and_route.3Dfoot_on_tagging_scheme.) > >> I have started a topic, but with little response so far. That's why I > >> come here, before proceeding. > >> > >> > >> Currently, there are four tagging scheme tables describing how walking (or > >> hiking) routes should be tagged. > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dfoot > >> > >> Would it not be easier and more clear if we just keep one, and add a link > >> to it in the others? > >> > >> Last month, I already started harmonizing these four tagging scheme > >> tables. I changed the order, added some missing tags, adjusted the > >> explanation etc... In my view, I only had to do minor edits. For those > >> interested, here are my edits: > >> > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Hiking&type=revision&diff=1878387&oldid=1873054 > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Walking_Routes&type=revision&diff=1881156&oldid=1879580 > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aroute%3Dhiking&type=revision&diff=1878383&oldid=1853636 > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aroute%3Dfoot&type=revision&diff=1878384&oldid=1853797 > >> > >> So these four tagging scheme tables are now almost 100% the same. > >> > >> > >> My idea was to keep the tagging scheme table on one of the wiki pages, and > >> put a link to it on the three other pages. I would like to have broader > >> support before going further. > >> > >> > >> Of course, we can discuss about the content of the tagging scheme. But > >> that's irrelevant to my question about the organization of the wiki page. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
