Is it OK to use natural=volcano for remains of volcanoes? There is volcano:status=extinct but I feel that tagging volcano-related rocks as volcanoes is a poor idea.
See https://www.steinmann.uni-bonn.de/institut/bereiche/endogene-prozesse/arbeitsgruppen/strukturgeologie/lehre/aufschluesse-im-rheinland/dachsbusch for a real example (text in German, but images should be clear). Triggered by https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1792260#map=18/50.42869/7.23260 Similar examples include Góra Swiętej Anny / Annaberg https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B3ra_%C5%9Awi%C4%99tej_Anny - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2241712057/history volcano existed here 27 millions years ago, volcanic cone is fully eroded and the current hill is made of stones formed in the caldera of the volcano. Wdżar https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wd%C5%BCar https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/726504503/history There are volcanic rocks here, mountains looks like a volcanonic cone, called volcano by some for marketing purposes but there is no reason whatsoever to describe it as volcano.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
