+1 On Mon., 15 Jul. 2019, 3:02 am Dave F via Tagging, < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> On 14/07/2019 13:07, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Occasionally I encounter tag combinations like this: > > > > bicycle=designated > > highway=proposed > > > > (from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335831004) > > > > where the "bikes can ride along here" of the first tag is contradicted > > by the "this hasn't even been built yet" of the second. > > No. it doesn't. Highway is the primary tag. It usurps sub-tags which are > merely adjectives of the primary. > When it has been completed it will be designated for use by bicycles. > > > > > Similarly, on occasion I've found ways which are tagged access=no > > ("nothing is allowed along here") but are part of a bike route > > relation ("bikes can ride along here"). > > Route relations should be aware of tags on ways. access=no can be used > in part to indicate road works. > Just because a way may be inaccessible to bikes doesn't mean it's not > still officially regarded as a cycle route (the NCN ref won't be removed) > > DaveF > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
