12 Jul 2019, 11:50 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
> On 12/07/19 19:02, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> 12 Jul 2019, 10:11 by >> 61sundow...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>>> :
>>
>>> On 12/07/19 17:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> sent from a phone
>>>>
>>>>> On 12. Jul 2019, at 09:12, Marc Gemis >>>>>
>>>>> <marc.ge...@gmail.com> <mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why would a private garden require a different key? Do we
>>>>> tag a
>>>>> private wood / forest in a different way than one that is
>>>>> accessible
>>>>> by the public? Do private parking lots get a different
>>>>> amenity-key ?
>>>>> No, we refine this with additional tags.
>>>>> This method can be applied to private gardens as well.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For some features we do distinguish, for others not. For
>>>> example a private bathroom, trash can or water tap would not be
>>>> tagged like a publicly accessible one (we put generally more
>>>> focus on usability/accessibility than on ownership).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Where are these private bathroom/s, trash can/s and water tap/s
>>> you mention Martin?
>>>
>> Public toilet: amenity=toilets
>> Private toilet: not tagged (so not tagged
>> like a public one)
>>
>> I am unable to link to well tagged private
>> toilets as in this case private tagging
>> is to not map it.
>>
>
> A similar logic would have private roads not mapped. Yet they are.
> Same for private buildings, farm yards, woods, beaches and so on.
>
I am not arguing against mapping
private gardens and other objects
that you mentioned.
But mapping private bathrooms and
water taps is not welcome.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
