Thanks everyone for the input. I've noted that "removed:" could be interesting in specific cases, however considering where this one is (and it's removal date!), I deleted it. ________________________________ De : Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> Envoyé : mardi 9 juillet 2019 17:23 Cc : Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Objet : Re: [Tagging] Removing an ATM
9 lip 2019, 16:27 od pla16...@gmail.com: Not really. They don't get rendered (on standard carto). So they don't help anyone orient themselves. OSM Carto is not a sole map style. As with disused: and abandoned:, the only real purpose is to prevent mappers re-instating the object based upon out-of-date information. Not only - some data consumers may want to include objects present but unused.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
