Some cases of lit=yes are clear (direct lighting of street/footway by lamps)
Some cases of lit=no are clear (no lighting whatsoever) But in cities there is also often strong or weak ambient light, for example: - carriageway is directly lit with so powerful light that spillover light makes footway well lit - clearly lit=yes - spillover light is quite dim but enough to comfortably walk - also lit=yes - there is some ambient light, but not enough to walk without own source of light - lit=no - there is an ambient light, one can carefully walk, but only slowly, people with poor eyesight needs their own source of light - lit=no (?) Overall, I am considering adding to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lit <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lit> recommendation to consider "is it necessary to bring your own light source to see it properly" as recommended threshold for footways/paths. Any problems with that or ideas for a better threshold between lit=yes and lit=no? disclaimer: I am trying to make lit=yes/no definition more precise as part of my grant https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/368849
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging