I've been tagging it with an empty amenity=school polygon around everything, and then two points with amenity=school + name=* + all the other specific tagging. But if mapped like that, a data consumer would see 3 schools. I like your solution with overlapping multipolygons.
Janko čet, 4. srp 2019. u 09:58 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> napisao je: > The one feature page states: > > - More than one of something on the same site e.g. two schools sharing > grounds. Normally if the schools are separate they would have separate > neighbouring grounds, but if the only thing defining a separation between > two schools is their buildings, then the containing area should be tagged > with a suitable landuse > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse>=*, and the buildings > tagged individually. > > > from > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element#Examples_of_bad_situations > > I don’t believe this is common practice, e.g. there isn’t even a landuse > value for schools. > I would rather tag 2 schools with distinct buildings and shared grounds as > 2 overlapping amenity=school areas with the “other buildings” (those of the > other school) excluded via multipolygon inner roles. > > If we did like currently suggested in the wiki it would also loose the > information about the grounds (only the buildings would result as schools). > > Cheers, Martin > > > sent from a phone > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
