Hi Ulrich, On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:16:18AM +0200, Ulrich Lamm wrote: > This way, my mapping of courses of water including the culvert > sections does not violate the principles of OSM. And the ban is > totally injust.
It violates the rights of the origin copyright holder. CC-BY-SA and others are not compatible with ODbL and thus we CAN NOT and MUST NOT take data from other sources which are not explicitly allowed. If we would allow this, and republishing data under ODbL (as OSM does with planet dumps) Openstreetmap commits a breach of Copyright. Thus it is absolutely vital for OSM to prevent people from adding incompatible, non ODbL Data to the Database. You have been told to not take data from other sources which are not ODbL multiple times and you havent stopped. Now Frederik (with my full support) stopped this repeated copyright violation by blocking/banning you. BTW - You signed these obligations with creating an OSM Account and opting in the Contributor Terms. https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms 1. We respect the intellectual property rights of others and we need to be able to respond to any objections by intellectual property owners. This means that: (a) Your contribution of data should not infringe the intellectual property rights of anyone else. If you contribute Contents, You are indicating that, as far as You know, You have the right to authorize OSMF to use and distribute those Contents under our current licence terms. If You do not have that right, You risk having Your contribution deleted (see below). You have multiple times been told that you do NOT have the right to redistribute this data under the current license (ODbL). Flo -- Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
