How do you propose visitors of the mailing list address responses like
this, Andy? I'm not being sassy: I honestly want to know.

Should it be ignored, becoming implicitly acceptable to the community?

Should it be called out, creating a long-running petty thread?

I've tried both. Maybe there's a third option?

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:54 AM Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 19:43, Nick Bolten <nbol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's a two-pronged recipe for disaster: make it very difficult to
>> independently know what to do, then have an often toxic environment for
>> those who suss out the semi-official, non-obvious place to ask questions.
>>
>
> A toxic environment, eh?  Doesn't that imply that some of those posting
> here are toxic?  Wouldn't
> accusing people of being toxic itself be toxic behaviour?  Oh, only if you
> mention them by name,
> eh?
>
> In any case, I didn't notice any toxicity about this environment until you
> showed up.  Strange, that.
>
> --
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to