22 May 2019, 00:38 by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com: > Le 22.05.19 à 00:16, Florian Lohoff a écrit : > >> >> Hi marc, >> >> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:02:53PM +0000, marc marc wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Le 21.05.19 à 23:46, Florian Lohoff a écrit : >>> >>>> Currently all Routing/Navigation application try hard to find >>>> the nearest or best point on the routeable network for a given >>>> destination lat/lon or object. >>>> >>> >>> with best, you mean : only one ? that look like wrong >>> a destination can have several points depending on the type >>> of locomotion. >>> the same type of locomotion can have several points, e.g. several ways >>> that desert a station by foot, several other for car, ... >>> >> >> What is the expectation to get navigated to when selecting a park? >> > > there is no such thing as "a single point that makes everyone agree" > take the case of a square park fenced by a fence, surrounded by 4 > streets each with a pedestrian entrance to the park. > those arriving from the north will probably want to stop at the street > to the north, while those arriving from the south will probably want to > stop at the street at the south entrance. > Those who have difficulty walking will probably prefer the car park > closest to an entrance, while others will prefer parking for people with > reduced mobility or free parking, all while they have all come by car. > on the basis of which objective criteria will you decide which point of > the public network is most suitable to reach the park? > Also, some people may drive (bicycle), other may arrive by a public transport others may walk or drive (by car) etc.
See for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/50.06288/19.91742 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/50.06288/19.91742> - a park that has multiple entrances, each may be preferred in some situation.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
