Le 20.05.19 à 17:36, Jan S a écrit : > I find camp_site:part=* somewhat complicated, too. Also, it wouldn't be > consistent with the use of camp_site=* to describe the type of camping > site, either.
tourism=camp_site + camp_site=basic/standard/serviced/deluxe and if you cut the site in several parts, camp_site:part=(camp_)pitch to describe each part > I'd prefer tourism=camp_pitch. This also has the advantage that this key > can be used for isolated camping pitches that are not part of a proper > camping ground. I find that it is precisely a defect. a camp_pitch does not define a basic camp_site limited to a single pitch (use tourism=camp_site + camp_site=basic for this, no need to add a part if the part=the whole camp_site). camp_pitch:part=* describes a part of a camp_site like building:part=* doesn't descript a building with one-part only. so a part always need to be in a camp_site like a building part need to be inside a building. but you can have a site with only one pitch and a deluxe service or have a site with a lot of pitch but basic service, there is no link between the number and quality _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
