> I’ve read that whole previous discussion, and from my point of view it was just a whole bunch of completely useless noise, with everyone telling you that you aren’t making sense and you ignoring it and bulldozing your way forward.
Well, so much for community discussion. I will make appeals to those interested in hearing other points of view. On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 10:09 PM <osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote: > I’ve read that whole previous discussion, and from my point of view it was > just a whole bunch of completely useless noise, with everyone telling you > that you aren’t making sense and you ignoring it and bulldozing your way > forward. > > > > *From:* Nick Bolten <nbol...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, 20 May 2019 10:48 > *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] "Unambiguous crossings" proposals and related > questions > > > > It's a little disappointing to see these points rehashed given the lengthy > recent discussions, but at the risk of creating a new massive thread I'd > like to clear some things up. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
