Haven’t checked if it shows up as an error, but technically, the grass on each side is the “sidewalk”, and it is simply a shortcoming of the current tagging schemes that it’s not possible to properly tag it as pedestrian routable area.
These lowered kerbs represents points with easy access from sidewalk to street for wheelchair users or people pushing prams, and I think it’s worthwhile to map them. From: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, 14 May 2019 10:24 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - crossing=marked On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 05:10, <osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au <mailto:osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au> > wrote: I must admit that I only map crossings when they are between formed footpaths eg https://www.google.com/maps/@-28.070784,153.4361817,3a,75y,133.97h,57.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1saeYx4cpvnikG8KXcdh0pGw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553154851, not where there is only a grass footpath. I do generally map crossings as long as they have lowered kerbs, like here: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/558999688670609448/577570543851536401/unknown.png That one, I would have terminated the crossing at the marked road, rather than taking it to the other side or even: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/558999688670609448/577571624585527296/unknown.png & that I wouldn't have marked at all. Does it show up in OSMose / OSM Inspector etc as an error because it's not "attached" to anything? Thanks Graeme https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6465544169 _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
