Hi Kevin, On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 17:35, Kevin Kenny <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please don't assume that every name that looks like a description is > simply a stopgap. Obviously, if you know you've misused the > description as the name, fix it, but where the guidebooks and signs > agree that the description is the name, please leave it alone.
Don't worry, i don't plan to retag such route names you listed! :) The routes i have in mind are public transport routes and *unnamed* hiking routes that currently are tagged name="[<route ref>: ]<departure> - <destination>" -- not just by myself. Note that the wiki [1] and the approved PTv2 scheme [2] recommend using the name tag in this way. [1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport#Service_routes [2]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=625726#Route If the community (or rather its majority) agree that the name tag shouldn't used that way and as soon as the editors display the route's description in the relations list [3], i'll fix my mistakes. [3]: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Dialog/RelationList Regards Markus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
