You have pretty much guaranteed that those who find it easier to respond here will vote against your proposal because it ignored their suggestions.
There are probably some here who will vote against your proposal even if they agree with it 100% because of your attitude. I'm not attempting to dictate what you do. I'm just informing you that actions can have unwanted consequences. Your choice as to what you do. -- Paul
- One has made clear that he has no time to process the mails here. Should I write it where I know he will read it? No! I will write them here and be angry about it that he didn't read them. So angry that I will vote against his proposal no matter what because he didn't read the mails I wrote knowing that he will have no time to read them.
Sorry, but this is just childish. If somebody is angry about not beeing heard when he chooses a way of communication for which it was made clear right from the start that there is no time to maintain it, I have no idea what would not make them angry.
If people want to vote from trump because "Hillary is bad" they don't argue, they search for an excuse.
As said, the wiki is much easier to use, has a much better layout, everything is in one place, the vote is held over there and I have no time to maintain two things at the same time.
Cutting off something that is not essential at the moment because of a lack of time is not an 'attitude' it's called time management.
If people vote against a proposal of which they think it's useful just because they are not fine with using an already established comment system they are not interested in constructive work.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
