On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 03:35, Michael Patrick <geodes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> our map would look like this :-) http://bit.ly/2IGkgoj > That's an amazing image, thanks Michael. I take it that's the home location of all OSM contributors? I'm surprised that India & especially China (where I thought OSM was banned?) are covered so well, & also a bit surprised that Australia & NZ have dropped back into the Ocean - I thought there were a few more of us than that? - us few seem to have done a pretty good job then! (cc'ed to AU list for interest's sake :-)) Thanks Graeme > Also, in regard to how 'sharp' the boundaries some of these > very large features are, if a person has a passing knowledge > of 'road cut' geology and mineralogy, they are incredibly > distinct, especially in the American Southwest. They are > also identifiable from DEM/DSM analysis, sometimes as > easily as coloring the elevation. > > I somewhat agree that 'if' it was at all to go into OSM, > there would be a special interest group that would > ride herd on a specialized name space. These geologic > regions are essentially 'historical' features, some on > the order of a billion years :-) > > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
