Hi Jeroen, On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 04:11:19PM +0200, Jeroen Hoek wrote: > On 04-04-19 15:41, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Schools have forever been landuse=residential as schools belong to > > residential areas. > > This is not always the case, especially in cases where schools share a > common campus.
No - Amenity and landuse intermix - Basically for me an amenity is always within a landuse. A landuse is a more general distinction of rough land usage whereas amenity is a concrete thing. Shifting an amenity into landuses confuses these two object classes, a rough classification of land usage, and a very distinct thing. > This proposal also co-opts existing tags rather than creating new one. > Does that assuage your concern for landuse=confusion? I still stand by my opposition. And while looking through the wiki history of landuse/landuse=residential and amenity=school i found this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:residential%3Duniversity Which is another issue like this. I'd like to have a very clear hierarchy in which objects exist which makes validation a lot easier. Flo -- Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
